Compare
Brainwrite vs Make
Brainwrite runs a team of AI agents that handle open-ended jobs you describe in plain English, while Make is a visual no-code platform for building automated scenarios across 3,000+ apps. Make is cloud-hosted, has a free plan and offers AI agents with manual approvals. Brainwrite is a macOS app where bots have roles, memory and their own tools.
Make- BrainwriteMake
- What it isDesktop app for a team of AI agentsVisual no-code automation, plus Make AI Agents
- Where it runsYour Mac, or Brainwrite CloudMake's cloud
- ApprovalsApproval cards for risky actionsManual approvals and stop points for agents
- SchedulingRoutines; local ones need the app runningRegular intervals; 15-minute minimum on Free
The short answer: Use Make to draw and run exact automations across many apps; use Brainwrite when the work needs research, drafting and judgment by a team of bots.
Private by design
Brainwrite runs on your Mac, or on your organisation's own server with the Organisation plan at $750 a year and a licence key for each paid year. Chats, files, and bot memory stay with you; bots talk only to the AI providers and apps you choose.
Security and privacy →Your AI, with no markup
Bots run on Claude, Codex, Grok, Cursor, local models, and more, under the plans you already pay for. Your provider bills that usage as usual; Brainwrite adds nothing to it, and you can switch a bot's engine without losing its memory.
Bring your own model →At a glance
Brainwrite and Make, side by side.
| Topic | Brainwrite | Make |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Desktop app for a team of AI agents | Visual no-code automation, plus Make AI Agents |
| Price | $99/mo Cloud or $750/yr Organisation | Free; Make plan from $9/mo; Enterprise custom |
| Free plan | No | Yes, up to 1,000 credits/mo |
| Apps | Composio connected apps plus custom MCP servers | 3,000+ apps |
| How you build | Describe the job to a bot | No-code visual scenario builder |
| Where it runs | Your Mac, or Brainwrite Cloud | Make's cloud |
| Scheduling | Routines; local ones need the app running | Regular intervals; 15-minute minimum on Free |
| Approvals | Approval cards for risky actions | Manual approvals and stop points for agents |
| MCP | Add custom MCP servers by command or URL | Make MCP Server |
Fair's fair
Where Make is ahead.
If one of these matters most to you, it may be the better choice today.
Free plan and low price
Make's free plan includes up to 1,000 credits a month, and the paid Make plan starts at $9 a month. Brainwrite has no free plan.
Visual builder
You see every step, router and filter on a canvas, which suits automations that must run the same way each time.
Large app catalog
Make lists more than 3,000 apps, so it covers many tools out of the box.
Cloud-hosted
Scenarios run in Make's cloud on a schedule with nothing to keep open. Brainwrite's local routines need the app running.
Where Brainwrite fits
What Brainwrite does differently.
Jobs, not diagrams
Tell the Chief of Staff the outcome you want and it splits the work across specialist bots, with no scenario to draw.
Bring your own AI
Bots run on Claude, Codex and other engines you already pay for, with no credits to buy from Brainwrite.
Real computers and browsers
Bots can use a local VM, a hosted cloud computer or your own VPS, with a browser tab you can watch and take over.
Which should you choose?
Pick the one that matches your work.
Choose Make if…
- You want exact, repeatable automations between apps.
- You like building visually and want a free or low-cost plan.
- You need an app that is in Make's catalog.
Choose Brainwrite if…
- The work needs research, writing and decisions, not only moving data.
- You want bots with roles and memory that work together.
- You already pay for Claude, Codex or another AI engine.
Using them together
Yes. A Make scenario can send an HTTP request to a secret webhook route on Brainwrite's local receiver to start a bot's task. Expose only that receiver through a narrow tunnel, and keep Brainwrite running, because local webhook deliveries stop when the app is closed.
FAQ
Brainwrite vs Make: questions
Is Brainwrite a Make alternative?
For some work. Make is best at fixed automations you design step by step on a canvas. Brainwrite is better when the job needs reading, research and judgment, such as preparing a report or drafting replies. Many teams use Make for data plumbing and Brainwrite bots for the thinking work.
How much does Make cost compared with Brainwrite?
Make has a free plan with up to 1,000 credits a month, and its Make plan starts at $9 a month. Brainwrite Cloud is $99 a month and does not include AI usage, which your own Claude, Codex or other provider bills separately.
Can Make start a Brainwrite bot?
Yes. Brainwrite has a local webhook receiver with secret hook routes, and a Make scenario can call one to start a bot's task. Put only the receiver behind a narrow tunnel, and keep the Brainwrite app running so it can accept the delivery.
Sources
Where these facts come from.
Make details were checked on 2026-10-07 against their own pages. Products change; tell us if something here is out of date via the contact form.
More comparisons
Other comparisons.
Brainwrite vs Zapier
Zapier runs fixed workflows across 9,000+ apps. Brainwrite runs a team of AI agents for work that needs judgment.
Brainwrite vs n8n
n8n is a visual, self-hostable workflow builder. Brainwrite is a Mac app for a team of AI agents you direct in plain English.
Brainwrite vs Relevance AI
Relevance AI is a hosted AI workforce platform. Brainwrite is a local-first Mac app for a team of agents on your own engines.
Give your first job to Brainwrite.
Download the app, connect the AI you already pay for, and tell your Chief of Staff what needs doing.
macOS today. Windows and Linux are coming soon.